Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section "section" doesn't exist in the file?
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section "section" doesn't exi in the file?
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values. The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll have to see.
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section
"section" doesn't exi in the file?
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values.
The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll have to see.
hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and null/undefined if it's not there at all
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Tue Sep 14 2010 08:22 pm
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section "section" doesn't exi in the file?
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values. The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll have to see.
hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and null/undefined if it's not there at all
I think I would prefer that behavior. How about you?
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Mon Sep 20 2010 15:14:14
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Tue Sep 14 2010 08:22 pm
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
Would it break anything if calling
file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of an empty object if the section "section" doesn't exi in the file?
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. Now, one cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains no keys/values. The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll have to see.
hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and null/undefined if it's not there at all
I think I would prefer that behavior. How about you?
certainly.. saw the commit, thanks!
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 20 2010 09:58 pm
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Mon Sep 20 2010 15:14:14
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Tue Sep 14 2010 08:22 pm
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: Digital Man to MCMLXXIX on Tue Sep 14 2010 16:32:06
Re: file.iniGetObject()
By: MCMLXXIX to Digital Man on Mon Sep 13 2010 10:30 am
Would it break anything if calling file.iniGetObject("section"); returned undefined instead of a empty object if the section "section" doesn't exi in the file
It's kind of a pain to work around that.
I just committed a change to do that, try it and let me know. No one cavea is that the method will return null/undefined if the specified section doesn exist in the .ini file *or* it contains keys/values. The second condition may prove to be a problem for some scripts. We'll have to see.
hmm. there's no way to have it both ways?
e.g. empty object if the section exists with no keys/values, and null/undefined if it's not there at all
I think I would prefer that behavior. How about you?
certainly.. saw the commit, thanks!
Cool. Are you able to build and test?
Sysop: | Ree |
---|---|
Location: | Toronto, ON |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 141:32:21 |
Calls: | 369 |
Files: | 2 |
Messages: | 38,444 |