• Re: On deeply held belief

    From Boraxman@VERT/MSRDBBS to Dumas Walker on Tuesday, November 10, 2026 08:50:00
    Dumas Walker wrote to Outatime <=-

    @MSGID: <6AF0AA93.14271.dove-rel@vert.synchro.net>
    A funny phenomenon I keep experiencing, or maybe always
    experienced but now notice more as I get older and more
    perceptive of others.

    Those who says they are "not religious" can be the most
    religious of all.

    You are not the only one to experience this. I have met some
    "atheists" who are at least as judgemental as the most conservatively-religious persons I have ever met when it comes to
    religion (or lack thereof).

    Pointing that out is a good way to get them really upset, too. ;)

    Political Correctness/Woke is the prevailing religion today. It is a belief system that is based on faith.

    There are very few people who don't have some faith-based belief system, who don't have at the core some assumptions that they build their belief system on.

    Some of the most fanatical fundamentalists are those who describe themselves as atheists. They technically are, but they are religious, its just their religion doesn't have a God (unless you count Hitler as some sort of anti-God)


    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org
  • From Outatime@VERT/BTTFBBS to Boraxman on Monday, November 09, 2026 20:43:00
    Some of the most fanatical fundamentalists are those who describe
    themselves as
    atheists. They technically are, but they are religious, its just their religion doesn't have a God (unless you count Hitler as some sort of anti-God)

    At this point the word "religious" is not part of my vocabulary when I talk about people of faith in God. Because at best it's meaningless in that context; at worst, it's derogatory.

    There is a word used to describe certain Christians, "evangelical," which means strictly, according to the (Christian) Gospel, and a little more nuanced, referring to Christians who hold firm the authority of the Bible and a personal conversion to faith. A number of Christian denominations--perhaps not Catholic, Orthodox, or some protestant mainline--could be described this way. But in public, it's a stain. It's the evangelicals who (used to) terrorize abortion clinics. Evangelicals had a big hand in voting in Trump, twice! Evangelicals hate gays. I mean, that's what they say. But none of it is actually true. It's a misused label for conveniently grouping people together who don't necessarily belong grouped together.

    So, even though it's a fine word with a solid definition, it's got baggage, like "religious" and I wouldn't use it among most company.


    ---
    * QWK2WWIV * Back to the Future (bttfbbs.com)
  • From Boraxman@VERT/MSRDBBS to Outatime on Wednesday, November 11, 2026 08:47:00
    Outatime wrote to Boraxman <=-

    @MSGID: <6AF289DE.14273.dove-rel@vert.synchro.net>
    Some of the most fanatical fundamentalists are those who describe themselves as
    atheists. They technically are, but they are religious, its just their religion doesn't have a God (unless you count Hitler as some sort of anti-God)

    At this point the word "religious" is not part of my vocabulary when I talk about people of faith in God. Because at best it's meaningless in that context; at worst, it's derogatory.

    There is a word used to describe certain Christians, "evangelical,"
    which means strictly, according to the (Christian) Gospel, and a little more nuanced, referring to Christians who hold firm the authority of
    the Bible and a personal conversion to faith. A number of Christian denominations--perhaps not Catholic, Orthodox, or some protestant mainline--could be described this way. But in public, it's a stain.
    It's the evangelicals who (used to) terrorize abortion clinics. Evangelicals had a big hand in voting in Trump, twice! Evangelicals
    hate gays. I mean, that's what they say. But none of it is actually
    true. It's a misused label for conveniently grouping people together
    who don't necessarily belong grouped together.

    So, even though it's a fine word with a solid definition, it's got baggage, like "religious" and I wouldn't use it among most company.

    Evangelicals are not a big thing here in Australia. There are some, and they've grown in the last couple of decades (thanks to US influence :( ), but for most of us here, it is a curiosity, something strange. Most Australians would probably agree with me when I say we don't really want that kind of thing here.

    This is a big cultural difference between us and the US. We don't do revivals. We don't do these big stadium filling political rallies. We're laid back and understated in the regard. I remember when a company I worked for was purchased by Americans, and the American managers came with their over-the-top "Gee golly aren't we all great today!" over-enthusiasm and we all cringed inside.

    From the point of view of someone who tries not to be religious, the key defining feature is that faith based belief. It's the "trust me, its true". "Trust me, I know" aspect.

    I'm agnostic, in the sense that I don't think anyone truly knows the nature of God, if there one, and anyone claiming to doesn't actually know more than me.



    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ MS & RD BBs - bbs.mozysswamp.org
  • From Outatime@VERT/BTTFBBS to Boraxman on Tuesday, November 10, 2026 22:03:00
    Evangelicals are not a big thing here in Australia. There are some, and they've grown in the last couple of decades (thanks to US influence :(

    Your biggest evangelical church - Hillsong - has actually had an outsized influence on the United States and globally. They are well known and their music has been sung in any US church that uses modern music, for about 20 years or so.



    ---
    * QWK2WWIV * Back to the Future (bttfbbs.com)