LIZARD KING wrote to ALL <=-
@VIA: RUNDER
@MSGID: <5BC7E7C4.1.dove-firearms@retrounderground.org>
...or is this just to provide people with a place to argue about gun control?
:-)
LK
---
= Synchronet = Retro Underground | retrounderground.org:6423
Oh yeah - have several - been an ownersince I was seven
years old.
LIZARD KING wrote to ALL <=-
@VIA: RUNDER
@MSGID: <5BC7E7C4.1.dove-firearms@retrounderground.org>
...or is this just to provide people with a place to argue about gun control?
:-)
LK
---
= Synchronet = Retro Underground | retrounderground.org:6423
... I wrote my own benchmark. My machine is now 500MHz.
In today's political climate, it's hard to avoid discussing firearms without bringing up gun control and gun rights. The other day I heard a politician say he only wanted to take away the "dangerous" guns. How does one define "dangerous?" Poorly designed? Inadequate safety precautions? Or are they referring to the effect of one being used, which requires a person with violent or wreckless intent to create a dangerous situation?
In today's political climate, it's hard to avoid discussing firearms witho bringing up gun control and gun rights. The other day I heard a politicia say he only wanted to take away the "dangerous" guns. How does one define "dangerous?" Poorly designed? Inadequate safety precautions? Or are the referring to the effect of one being used, which requires a person with violent or wreckless intent to create a dangerous situation?
That sounds like a trick... any gun is dangerous for the person/animal it
is being pointed at.
It's only as dangerous as the person pulling the trigger. The same can be said about a hammer, or an automobile. Drive or swing at people with violent intent, then suddenly your everyday implement is an assault weapon.
Regardless, what you say is correct. Technically by that definition a gun can be dangerous because it is easy to use, cumbersome, big, small, long, short, of large caliber, or of small caliber. Some can be dangerous because they look scary, or because they don't look scary. The earliest of gun laws were written to prohibit people of color from carrying concealable pistols,
Re: Anyone out there have any
By: Moondog to Dumas Walker on Sun Apr 21 2019 10:35 am
It's only as dangerous as the person pulling the trigger. The same can b said about a hammer, or an automobile. Drive or swing at people with violent intent, then suddenly your everyday implement is an assault weapo
Regardless, what you say is correct. Technically by that definition a gu can be dangerous because it is easy to use, cumbersome, big, small, long, short, of large caliber, or of small caliber. Some can be dangerous beca they look scary, or because they don't look scary. The earliest of gun l were written to prohibit people of color from carrying concealable pistol
anything is a weapon. if it was in fashion for people to stab people in the eye with pens, we would have anti pen lobbyists.
anything is a weapon. if it was in fashion for people to stab people in the eye with pens, we would have anti pen lobbyists.
MOONDOG wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-
@VIA: CAVEBBS
@MSGID: <5CBA007C.1903.dove-gun@cavebbs.homeip.net>
@REPLY: <5CB6D89F.2878.dove-gun@vert.synchro.net>
Re: Anyone out there have any
By: JIMMY ANDERSON to LIZARD KING on Tue Apr 16 2019 12:16 pm
In today's political climate, it's hard to avoid discussing firearms without bringing up gun control and gun rights. The other day I heard
a politician say he only wanted to take away the "dangerous" guns. How does one define "dangerous?" Poorly designed? Inadequate safety precautions? Or are they referring to the effect of one being used,
which requires a person with violent or wreckless intent to create a dangerous situation?
Oh yeah - have several - been an owner
since I was seven
years old.
LIZARD KING wrote to ALL <=-
@VIA: RUNDER
@MSGID: <5BC7E7C4.1.dove-firearms@retrounderground.org>
...or is this just to provide people with a place to argue about gun control?
:-)
LK
---
= Synchronet = Retro Underground | retrounderground.org:6423
... I wrote my own benchmark. My machine is now 500MHz.
---
= Synchronet = The Cave BBS - Since 1992 - cavebbs.homeip.net
It's only as dangerous as the person pulling the trigger. The same can be said about a hammer, or an automobile. Drive or swing at people with violent intent, then suddenly your everyday implement is an assault weapon.
Regardless, what you say is correct. Technically by that definition a gun can be dangerous because it is easy to use, cumbersome, big, small, long, short, of large caliber, or of small caliber. Some can be dangerous because they look scary, or because they don't look scary.
So we should pull all the dangerous cars from the road
too... :-)
Re: Anyone out there have any
By: MRO to Moondog on Sun Apr 21 2019 03:39 pm
anything is a weapon. if it was in fashion for people to stab people in the eye with pens, we would have anti pen lobbyists.
The pen is mightier than the sword.
Nightfox
Re: Anyone out there have any
By: JIMMY ANDERSON to LIZARD KING on Tue Apr 16 2019 12:16 pm
In today's political climate, it's hard to avoid discussing firearms without
| Sysop: | Ree |
|---|---|
| Location: | Toronto, ON |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:52:32 |
| Calls: | 369 |
| Files: | 2 |
| Messages: | 38,903 |